“One of
the virtues of knowing a bit of math is that you can impress the hell out of
your friends.”
This quote
is probably the coolest that I have ever heard from a mathematical author.
Again, Ian Stewart has proved that not all of the curiosities lie beneath the
universe: they are just suspended in numbers.
The book A
Cabinet of Curiosities has given me a lot of insights about the puzzles that
evolve around math: certain mysteries that has not been taught or learned, just
analyzed and thought. Not just the
classic puzzles, but the new ones that can really boggle up minds. I am not
quite the “thinking” type, but by just reading the book, it will present math’s
other side of the coin.
Can you
make a pop-up dodecahedron? How can you alternately fill a glass of water? Who
tells the truth and lie? How can you extract a cherry from a glass? These are
just some of the questions Stewart asked that he presented in the book. And the
answers? One word: fascinating.
As the
author mention in his introduction, you can skip at any page you like, but it’s
more fun to follow the table of contents, for earlier problems are easy to
solve than the on the proceeding pages, which as he said, challenging. But I
think solving the first problem was quite tricky for me. I am referring to the
problem Alien Encounter in which we have to identify the species of the aliens,
one being always tells the truth and the other that tells a lie. I first
encountered this problem in a math quiz bowl we have attended, but I was wrong
about it. Seeing it again another time made me really think. Now I really kind
of contemplated and when I flipped on the answer key guide, then again I was
wrong. This problem may be not math-related but I assume, and is a fact that
logical deductions are indeed of a necessity in the mathematical field.
Another
problem presented in this book that I have already encountered is the River
Crossing which involves a wolf, a goat and a cabbage. The player is the boatman
and needs to carry only one to pass cross the river without the wolf eating the
goat or the goat eating the cabbage. This is quite simpler since the wolf does
not eat cabbage so the goat will be the first transported followed by either
the wolf or cabbage. If one of the two were transported, the goat is carried
back to the starting point, and the one being left will be carried back. The
boatman returns to get the goat and voila, you solved a problem.
What’s
unique about this book? I can say its uniqueness lies on the table of contents.
As I skimmed through it, there were many chapters included but when you look at
their pages, they are really short. The longest may be two pages at maximum.
There are no morale, no story, no love, and no horror. Just mind-boggling g
math puzzles, math anecdotes, and the one which I am not quite fond of, math
jokes.
There are
anecdotes in this book as well as jokes which generally, I don’t get at all.
Either that they are so deep or I’m the one shallow individual. Either way, it
was a nice thing that the author has mixed it up with this to avoid his readers
being bored or tired of solving his golden puzzles. But having them, a kind of
say “corny” jokes is a big no-no for me.
Reading
the book, I can say that Stewart has offered small bits of math problems which
are really a great exercise for the mind instead of serving a full course of
x’es and y’s and complicated terminologies, graphs and figures, which I think
is a “hooker” for an average, non-mathematician (like me… sssssshhhh….) reader.
This book
has given me an idea that not all math problems are a bunch of boring stuffs
you can pin a wall and shoot with a shotgun, but enigmas that can be
synthesized not by just following a bunch of long, difficult formulae and can
be solved in some little ordinary ways. What it needs are three things:
interest, willingness and determination. After all, “There are three kinds of
people in the world: those who can count, and those who can’t.”
No comments:
Post a Comment