What is mathematics to
you? Do you get butterflies in your tummy everytime you encounter this? Does
this thing make your heart have premature ventricular contractions or in other
words, skip a beat? But perhaps when you hear mathematics, you go like “meh,
that again?!”? Or whenever you get low grades in math subjects you just say
“Nah. I love math but it does not feel the same way for me. Paasa ra na sya.” If you said “yes” to
the second and third sentences, then probably you are an alien (just kidding
kiddo). But if you agreed with me in the
latter sentences, then dude, welcome to the club!
Biology and mathematics seem to me like oil and water. If
these two elements were animate, they would never have a common point; they
would always be like asymptotes… infinitely trying, but never really reaching.
Well, biology and mathematics is my sweet and sour thing. :)
In a book entitled The
Mathematics of Life, Ian Stewart (the author) tries to build a strong
connection between mathematics and biology. And I tell you, he is really good
at it. He starts of by stating the five revolutions in biology: (1) the
microscope, (2) the system of classification, (3) evolution, (4) genetics and
(5) the structure of DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid). But he has his 6th
revolution. That is, mathematics. You
might wonder why mathematics came only sixth when in other fields of science,
mathematics is mostly the foundation. This, my dear, is the essence of this
book.
The microscope, which is the 1st revolution,
made us see what our naked eyes cannot see. It gave us a torch in a pitch-black
place, and opened our minds to an invisible world. The system of classification,
developed by Carl Linnaeus as recorded in his book, Systema Natural, eradicated confusions in naming organisms. Imagine if taxonomy was not invented, what we
think we are both thinking is not really the thing we are actually thinking.
Tsk tsk tsk. Genetics, on the other hand, has been developed from mathematical
patterns observed by Gregor Mendel in his babies: the green peas. Genetics gives
us ideas on what your future child would look like and a whole lot of other
INTERESTING things, such as the jaw-dropping Human Genome Project. I once read
somewhere that knowing the whole genetic code of the human species is like
having a manual on human beings. Amazing, isn’t it? Furthermore, the structure of DNA was
patented by Francis Crick and James Watson. And lastly, the sixth revolution
would be mathematics. Why? It is because math unites all the other five
revolutions, yielding another interdisciplinary in science, that is,
biomathematics. Biomathematics helps biologists in creating solid support to
studies, and most especially to provide better comprehension.
The book also contains
more discussions on the coordination of mathematics with biology, such as the
Fibonacci explanation on petal patterns. He, the author, debunks this
explanation by elaborating the association of biochemistry and mechanics that
had resulted to these petal patterns. Chaotic population dynamics,
Hodgkin-Huxley equation for axons, Alan Turing’s Reaction-diffusion from his
observations on animal spots and stripes were also tackled on the book.
The author also favors characterization over the concept
of species by using the multidimensional clusters with common properties that
can be supported statistically. Furthermore, biomathematics is very useful on
predicting new types of viruses and their structure by applying the concept of
geometry in more than three dimensions.
The Knot Theory was also hugely discussed in the book.
This theory provides a simplified explanation on DNA synthesis, which is a very
complicated molecular process. The Knot Theory also serves as a good
representation for other studies that involved DNA, such as the one on
site-specific recombination in DNA by Nicholas Cozzarelli (1985). The complex network of wires occurring between
the retina and visual cortex could also be explained by the role of
mathematical map and its coordination with hallucinogenic drugs. These theories
and more aspects on mathematical biology were deeply discussed in the book. I
suggest you to give the book a chance. You’ll see, it will surely be a time
well spent. :)
Indeed, reading this book was more of an entertainment
than a burden to me. I like the author’s style of writing. He is gentle and
does not impose his opinions too strongly like how Reuben Hersh did in the What is Mathematics, Really?.
Furthermore, since the book was published only in 2011, this book is updated
and would really give you helpful, new insights on how the current world of
biology is. Personally, I am not a fan of mathematics but
I am really into biology. Having mathematics as a big part in biology at first
seemed to me like being in a graveyard…a place enveloped with death and
greyness. But with this work of Ian Stewart, mathematics became more alive and colorful.
From its old grey pigment of indifference, math now shows a majestic
rainbow-like display of possibilities and innovations. In his conclusions, he
said: “A model that is as complex as the process or thing it represents is
likely to be too complex to be useful.” Hence, to make life as light as a
breeze, we must, on the counterpart, make the things that comprise it as simple
as possible. Mathematics translates life, and biology makes sense of it. Life
is a simple thing only made complicated by our own doings. And perhaps, simplicity
is the secret to life’s enigma. Are you
with me?
hmm, I am definitely with you. choss! I like it how you describe math and bio together. haha. you summarized the book very well :) nice job lai :)
ReplyDeleteI'm with you on 'infinitely trying, but never really reaching..' I mean, we used to believe that math has really nothing to do with bio. But with this updated book, it's clear how much the marriage of these two powerful fields can yield for us to satisfy our curiosities as humans. Brief but brilliant presentation of important points! Good job! :D
ReplyDelete