Ian
Stewart’s The Mathematics of Life, informs
us that there was more to the history of science that we ought to know. The
discovery of theories and principles, inventions of different kinds of both
scientific apparatuses we use in this modern age, the breakthroughs that lead
us to where we are right now by our forefathers; was with the help of both
science and mathematics.
The
author did a great job to make us acknowledge the emerging and probably one of
which will be the greatest breakthrough to our human age; biomathematics. The
author points out that there were five (5) revolutions that changed the
scientists’ point of view towards life. These five revolutions are the
microscope, classification, evolution, genetics, and lastly, the structure of
DNA. But there was one thing the author said in his book and it is about the
sixth revolution, and it is mathematics.
I, too, was shocked when he stated this in his book but
the author pretty much changed my way of thinking too. Since mathematics has
been with the human race for hundreds of years, Babylonians was even intrigued
by theoretical mathematics that they wrote an ample amount of text involving
geometry and algebra to uphold their civilization. But more than that, Stewart
stated that the first revolution happened 300 years ago. And it was the
microscope, which surprisingly enough, was inspired by the works of the great
Galileo Galilei’s telescope. This gave way to different breakthroughs in
biology, genetics, etc.
The
next evolution is the classification, taxonomy, for that matter. And taxonomy
was not just some fancy way to classify an animal just by naming one after the
other by putting some fancy Latin names, it was a systematic way to classify a
domestic cat, a Siamese cat, etc. Part of which is mathematics had a role in
classifying units and sets of variables with the use of diagrams and tables.
Furthermore, the reason why subdivisions were made is because, over time more
and more animals and organisms are discovered and then classified to the groups
they are related. The amounts of animals and/or organisms are so plenty that
scientists used mathematical equation to get a theoretical sum of a certain
species. This operation and many others are now commonly used to get a
theoretical amount of a certain species, endangered or not.
The
third revolution stated by the author was evolution. When I was a kid, I was
fascinated by the theory of evolution. Watching informative yet theoretical
television shows gave me such bliss. I often question myself if they were
really true. How thousand years ago, certain fishes knew how to walk the earth
with their odd fins that acted like feet. But the author said that the third
revolution got off of a bad start. Since evolution was not widely acknowledged
when it was first introduced solely because scientists, mostly taxonomists,
encouraged that newly discovered species were not evolving – just not seen yet.
Charles Darwin opposed the idea, he said that evolution was an essential key to
survival. In his research he used various arithmetic operations because,
theoretically he calculated the population of the evolving species.
Fourth
revolution was brought to light due to the help of the microscope. Genetics was
triggered by the great mind of Gregor Mendel, who was a gardener when he was
young. Biologists those days did not accept Mendel’s theories, mainly because they
are conflicted with prevalent belief that characters passed from parent to
offspring by ‘blending’. But after his death, two scientists rediscovered his unappreciated
and unread papers. Various biologists began experimenting, too. One of which,
tested breeding on grasshoppers and found out that a physical factor of
heredity, the chromosomes. Stewart did
not fail to miss a single string in this thread, he profoundly explained the
origins of the discovery of genetics. He noted every single important details
through the subject matter, using mathematics in figuring out the probability
of an offspring.
The fifth revolution, and is widely known as our genetic
code that makes us different from everyone else, is the DNA. DNA or
deoxyribonucleic acid is a molecule that encodes the genetic instructions used
in the development and functioning of all living organisms and viruses.
Scientists used a series of mathematical experiments. They substituted these
molecules into letter and began to illustrate the DNA, until they got what they
were looking for, a double helix DNA structure that fits perfectly to a
molecule that sustains life.
And
lastly in Stewart’s book, he implied that Mathematics is the sixth revolution. He
described that Mathematics has been in accord with the works of physical
science for a long time. The author talks about Mathematics’ wide range of help
in various discoveries in the field of the burgeoning biomathematics. I was
inspired by this book because I learned more about science and how mathematics
aided in its research. Many of which are surprisingly enough, I thought had
nothing to do with Mathematics. The author pointed out that biomathematics aim
is the selection of useful models, it wants us to take biology seriously – not
missing out anything crucial, and lastly is to pay attention to the problems
biologists want to solve. Ian Stewart stated in his book that his sixth
revolution is not that revolutionary, though. Since no one ever used
mathematics solely to solve a scientific problem. What is revolutionary about
it is the paramount of methods used, and the extent of which they are starting
to set the agenda of biology. The author encourages us to be eclectic to the
idea that the Mathematics and Biology community has long been interconnected.
We should embrace his work, and embrace the new epoch that is to come. The
profundities are infinite when you use both of them to seek out neoteric
theories, discoveries, and inventions that would help both humans and other organisms
alike.
Understanding how two big worlds come across to a certain point, it gives something to think upon. That even different things could have something to do with each other. Math and Science are two big worlds, different ideas involved, however they still have something to do on the existence of the other. Math is really something big.
ReplyDeleteThis blog has clearly articulated that Science and Mathematics are not mutually exclusive fields. Instead, they work hand in hand for the purpose of improving human lives. Thanks for this shared knowledge, paving the way for us to realize that disciplines (such as Science and Mathematics) exist not to combat each other but to foster interdisciplinary research and education.
ReplyDeleteMath alone is already complicated (for me) as well as Science (again, for me) but I loved how the author had managed to weave or intertwine Mathematics and Science to form one splendid idea. Kudos writer! One fine book report I must say. I think I don't have to read the whole book because your report is already informative. Keep your good works coming! :)
ReplyDelete