What is the best
way to spend your vacation? Read Ian Stewart’s Mathematics of Life. In this
book he discusses his idea on the 5 biological revolutions and recognizes a 6th
one. The first is the invention of the microscope and next came the systematic
classification the planet’s living creatures. The third revolution is the
theory of evolution preceding the discovery of the gene and the fifth is the discovery
of the DNA structure. The 6th is of course.. Mathematics.
He thoroughly
discusses these points in his chapters. Stewart stresses on the role of math in
each revolution. Sure, biology has worked hand in hand with mathematics for a
long time, but nothing more than a servant. I couldn’t agree more when Stewart
says biology is the branch of science to go to if you want to avoid math as
much as possible. Apparently that boat sailed long ago, I would testify.
Mathematics is definitely the new tool in the biology kit.
The invention of
microscope marked the first biological revolution. Before that, we looked at
everything on a human scale. Stewart explains this so much better with his
moon, cow and flea metaphor. But as far as my understanding goes, we pretty much
settled on whatever detail our naked eye can give. Until came the lens which
aided our naked eye to see distant objects like planets and the teeny tiny
bacteria. Along great discoveries come great ructions. Poor Galileo died for
his observations and deductions (through the telescope) that the universe
doesn’t revolve around the earth because the religious authorities thought it
was horrifying. Luckily, the discoverers which utilized the microscope didn’t
share Galileo’s fate. The microscope had not only opened the internal world of
very small creatures. It paved the way for countless milestones to
understanding life better. Mathematical models helped biologists understand
different forms of developments.
Finding patterns
is one of the things that define mathematics. Not a lot of discussion is needed
to talk about what math has got to do with the classification of every species
on earth. That is because the Linnaean system classification deals with an
awful lot of patterns. To prove this, Fibonacci numbers are even found in
floral patterns, spiral patterns in pineapples, growing tip of Arabidopsis and
so much more. Truly, even biologist students, could still learn so much from
this book. One of those is the importance of classification system. I used to
say, ‘why Carl, why you make this system?
Now I have a bucketful to memorize, such a pain in the arse’. Sure,
classification is merely butterfly collecting in the complexity of biology as
Stewart would put it. But there’s more to it than just that, and I quote “Many
sciences could not have arisen without an initial stage of butterfly collecting”.
Next revolution
on the list is the theory of evolution. In this chapter Stewart talks about Darwin’s
adventure and how he was credited the father of evolution. In some point, a
reader would realize that evolution was not entirely Darwin’s idea. He was more
into natural selection and its evidences but he did made a point that it was
possible to have drastic changes in species given the right amount of time and
conditions. One of the literatures that convinced Darwin was Thomas Malthus’s
1826 Essay on the Principle of Population, wherein populations grow
geometrically while resources grow arithmetically. Needless to say, that was
math in action.
The discovery of
genes was made possible by Gregor Mendel. His journey is yet another story Stewart
did not fail to tell. One of Mendel’s most important contribution was
mathematical--- the ratio of the phenotypes and genotypes of the next
generation in pea plants (a way better
idea than nasty bees). Moreover, his extensive work lifted the fog of the
prevailing principle of blending inheritance. Mendel answered the question ‘what?’
but not ‘how’. Although he did think there were these ‘factors’ that was
involved, which brings us to the next revolution.
Scientists eventually
figured out that inheritance was written in the molecule called deoxyribonucleic
acid (DNA). The great mystery now lies on how it looked and how it worked. Various
observations lead to the double-helix model by Watson and Crick. One of these
observations by Chargaff was the identical percentage of guanine and cytosine as
well as of thymine and adenine in different species. It led him to the
inference that the bases always come in pairs. Finally x-ray was invented and
this was made possible by the mathematics of wave interference. You will find
out that mathematics has been playing a big role in these discoveries more than
you ever thought.
As I’ve mention,
mathematics is more than just adding, subtracting or finding x who seems to be
always lost. Stewart says: “what we learn at school is a tiny, limited part of
a vast enterprise. To call it one-tenth of one per cent would be generous.” And
so in the next chapters, Stewart delves on the sixth revolution- the fusion of mathematics
and biology. He makes clear descriptions of how mathematics became a tool in
the biology kit. Points which could not possibly be placed better in words than
Stewart did.
The book Mathematics
of Life is surprisingly great. The author has a great sense of humour without trying
so hard. His writing style has much resemblance with that of my fave author Rick
Riordan (hi there Percy Jackson fans!).
I guarantee you will love his metaphor like you love Dr. House’s. It makes
things sound easy. This book is very reader-friendly that the general public
would understand his discussions without breaking a sweat. It was like my Introduction
to Biology subject jam-packed in 369 pages with emphasis on the relationship of
math and biology. I didn’t thought it was possible to be thorough and concise
at the same time, but Stewart certainly did achieve that. It must’ve taken unimaginable
research to be able to get the tiniest detail like Darwin’s love life.
And I’m really starting to sound like a fan-girl
now, but Stewart writes like he’s actually talking to his readers, not merely
blabbing his thoughts out needlessly. He managed to write very informatively without
being dogmatic. Honestly, I did enjoy reading it. I could say it was really
worth my time, almost like I didn’t do it for a project. Okay, reading a math
book over vacation is probably not the best way to spend leisure time. But if
you ever plan on reading one, it has got to be The Mathematics of Life.
No comments:
Post a Comment