I
seriously did not expect to read a novel like this in my life. “A Certain
Ambiguity” was one of those books which seemed to pull you in without you
knowing about it. I mean, at the very beginning of the novel, I was tricked into
getting my calculator and playing around with Bauji’s number game. I loved it
for that, because not even math books can make me happily grab my calculator.
This
story is more on how Ravi Kapoor, the main character, wanted to know more about
the mathematics that his grandfather loved. While he was young, his grandfather
passed away, leaving him a huge sum of money that would lead him to a school in
America.
This is
where I get to know the other characters of the book. I have to say, the
authors did a good job in creating their characters. Peter was Ravi’s roommate
who seemed to know where he was going in life. He was the one that persuaded
Ravi to take Nico’s class. Nico was their teacher who did a great job in
explaining infinity to his students. He was very considerate, and he loved to
challenge his students from time to time. PK was a classmate of Ravi, who
seemed relaxed but was actually good with mathematics. Adin is my favorite; he
was one who wanted to find certainties in life and was more of a philosopher
than a mathematician. He loves jazz and is not that good with it. Lastly there’s
Claire, and even though not directly stated, she was the love interest of Ravi.
She’s really good in math, and she can prove some theorems faster than anyone
in their class. The character variety is good, but there are times where I find
them a bit boring, due to a monotonous tone that I can sometimes sense.
Another thing I loved about the
book was how they easily incorporated math concepts into the story. When Ravi
started in Nico’s class, I felt like I was one of Nico’s students. It took me
some time to realize that I was tricked into reading something math related.
What I didn’t expect was how much I enjoyed it, especially that problem of the
runner, where he has to cover an infinite number of half-distances. The authors
did great on capturing me, but I thought that it was the only moment I would
find fun in the book.
Turns out I was wrong. The case
of Ravi’s grandfather was another amazing concept of the book. I, like Ravi
himself, was shocked to find that Bauji has been in prison. It was due him
being ‘blasphemous’, according to the point of view of the people of New
Jersey. A strong argument in the book involved God’s infinity, which I firmly
believed. It was quite uncomfortable to know that Bauji was an atheist, but
like Judge Taylor, I tried to keep an opened mind. It was one of the author’s
successes; handling sensitive arguments like this.
My favorite part was when Clair
proved there is no greatest prime. It was funny to think that they discussed
this in one of Peter’s party. It would seem unrealistic because, come on! Who
would want to discuss mathematics during a party? But I really loved the way
she proved it. My mouth was definitely hanging by the time she finished, and it
took me a couple of seconds to fully appreciate it. Since I was alone in the
room while reading this bit, I practically blabbered “Amazing! Wow! Awesome!” continuously
for about 2 minutes. I was tricked again by the authors into slightly loving
math. This is when I decided, “Hmmm, this book is good”.
Another favorite part of mine
are the bits where the Judge and Vijay Sanhi discussed his situation. They were
supposed to discuss whether Bauji was to be freed or to continue to trial, but
it all ended up in mathematics, particularly geometry. It was fun though. I
loved how Vijay Sanhi proved the Pythagorean theory using geometry. It left my
mouth agape once again. I loved how the authors incorporated mathematics not
just to the lecture parts of Nic, but even to Peter’s party and Bauji’s discussion
with the Judge. It was quite entertaining to read the Judge being totally into
it though. Most judges would probably tell him to proceed with why he committed
blasphemy.
Another thing I love about this
book is because it totally corresponded with the BBC: Story of Maths 4. It was
good to watch it before reading the book, because the mathematicians involved
in the book where the same ones we saw in the movie. After all, the book is
mostly about infinity, and so was the movie. Good thing I saw Cantor in the
movie, and because of this I was able to catch up to Nico’s lecture about how
Cantor paired every integer with a fraction. His problem though, was whether
there was infinity between the infinity of real numbers and the infinity of
natural numbers. This was hard to grasp, even for Cantor.
As the story progresses, I got
to read several transcripts about Sanhi and the Judge. One challenging
transcript was te one about Euclid’s The
Elements. This part made me understand more about the book, and why it was
very importand for geometry. It is also where I learned the meaning of axioms.
Apparently, axioms are self evident beginning principles, from which other
truths come from. It was entertaining to see how Sanhi wanted to demonstrate to
the Judge how he did not believe in God using geometry.
I also liked when Ravi and
Claire would try to solve Nico’s problems together. It was like the author’s
had no experience in trying to make love stories, probably because the main
thought of the book was about math. I find it fun though, especially when they
sought a set with a greater cardinality than that of real numbers.
The last part of the book was
mostly about the 5th postulate in Euclid’s book, and how various
mathematicians, including themselves, found hard to prove or demonstrate.
Around this part of the book, several mathematicians were mentioned, and those
mathematicians were the same ones I saw in the BBC movie. Non-euclidean
geometry was discussed as well, and I found a hard time trying to grasp it.
In the end, Bauji was released,
and he still kept a friendship with Judge Taylor. Ravi finally was able to put
his thoughts about his grandfather to rest. He also was offered a job in a
bank, but he chose math over that because of his love for math, and possibly
Claire.
I loved the book, and honestly
it was more relaxing to read compared to the 2 previous books. What I really
liked was how it captured me. It wasn’t like the others. Reading the previous
books was like watching a documentary, but reading this book was like watching
a movie. I also liked how they sometimes incorporate journals made by several
mathematicians during their time. I don’t know if the journals they made were
really genuine, but it was perfect the way they incorporated it into a
particular part of the story. All in all, this book is great for getting people
to read more about mathematics and infinity, and it helps in knowing more about
the previous people who helped build a foundation for mathematics.
No comments:
Post a Comment